James Bromige

< Back
Barrister

James has a successful nationwide employment practice, instructed on behalf of both Claimants and Respondents across England and Wales and routinely in week long or multi-week hearings.  He is often involved in cases concerning large public or professional bodies, such as the NHS, Solicitors Firms or Charities.

Solicitors are delighted with his down to earth yet no nonsense approach to litigation, and his ability to give realistic and pragmatic advice to his clients with regards to prospects of success and settlement.  James works alongside Solicitors from giving initial advice on merits, through to drafting the ET1 or ET3, representation at CMDs and PHRs and ultimately at Tribunal and EAT.  He also has experience of reaching successful outcomes at Judicial Mediation.

Whilst accepting instructions in all areas of employment law, due to his prior experience in the Crown Court, James is frequently called upon to deal with cases of whistleblowing or discrimination, or where there is an issue of dishonestly, owing to his thorough, thoughtful and robust advocacy style.

He has a particular interest in the enforceability of restrictive covenants in employment contracts, and is regularly instructed to appear in County and High Court to seek injunctive relief on behalf of employers.

James often lectures on updates in employment law.  He has previously delivered well received seminars on restrictive covenants and the impact of Griffiths v DWP [2015] EWCA upon discrimination law and is currently delivering an update on whistleblowing dismissal and detriments in light of Jhuti v Royal Mail [2017] EWCA Civ 1632.

 

Appellate Cases

Pulman v Merthyr Tydfil College Ltd UKEAT/0309/16/JOJ – application of section 19 Equality Act 2010, relationship between sections 15 and 20 Equality Act and Burns/Barke principal.

Recent and Current Instructions include

Re: D.  James is currently instructed on behalf of the Claimant for an Equal Pay Claim for a Tribunal Judge in Scotland.

Re: AS.  James will be appearing at the Newcastle ET for 11 days in July 2018, representing the Respondent in a disability discrimination and constructive dismissal claim.

Re: TF.  James is representing the First and Second Respondent in a Agency Worker claim concerning 240 Claimants and 6 Respondents.  The matter is due before the EAT on a preliminary point in June 2018.

Re: NG.  James was instructed to represent the Office of a Member of the European Parliament to defend allegations of disability discrimination.  The claim was dismissed.

Re: BC – James represented a Respondent College in the East Midlands for a 14 day hearing concerning 36 allegations of public disclosure detriments and direct race discrimination.  All elements of the claim were dismissed.

Re: BF – Successfully defended a Housing Charity against 42 allegations of sex discrimination, sexual harassment and victimisation, as well as constructive dismissal. The Tribunal accepted James’ forceful submission that elements of the claim were “a logical and legal nonsense”.

Re: K – Represented the Claimant in a multi-facted discrimination claim with the central issue being an allegedly forged contract over nine days of evidence. James sought (and was granted) the unusual step of an order for disclosure by physical inspection at the Respondent’s premises after large disclosure issues arose.

Re: AM – Successfully resisted a claim for costs by the Respondent after the late withdrawal of a claim by James’ client owing to ongoing health issues.

Re: JL – Successfully represented the Respondent, a Solicitor’s Firm, in a constructive dismissal claim brought by a former Partner of the Firm.

Re: LG – Represented the Claimant in a five day whistleblowing and unfair dismissal claim against an NHS Trust with linked HCPC proceedings.

Re: SA – Represented the Respondent in a five day pregnancy related discrimination and redundancy claim at Leicester ET.

Re G – Represented the First Claimant in a six day case concerning whistleblowing after the Claimant raised concerns about abusive practices and care of a vulnerable adult.  In a reserved Judgement the Tribunal found that James’ client had been the victim of a “calculated campaign” by the Respondent after she blew the whistle. At the remedies hearing James successfully argued for a maximum Vento award, resulting in £52,000 in compensation and an additional £10,000 in costs.

Qualifications

2005-2008 BA (Hons) – Royal Holloway, University of London
2008-2009 GDL/CPE – London South Bank University
2009-2010 BVC – City Law School

Interests

James is a SCUBA Diving instructor and can often be found exploring the numerous shipwrecks in the English Channel. He also enjoys cricket, ice hockey and supporting Bath Rugby.

Contact Us

Latest News

View All News